Union City vs Burnsville
Union City, CA compared with Burnsville, MN · 1,565 miles apart
Union City has 65,282 residents to Burnsville’s 65,244. Union City comes out ahead on median household income, bachelor's degree +, poverty rate. Burnsville does better on median rent, average commute, unemployment.
| Union City, CA | Burnsville, MN | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 65,282 | 65,244 |
| Density (per sq mi) | 3,365 | 2,616 |
| Median household income | $133,715 | $87,024 |
| Median home value | $1,104,900 | $355,200 |
| Median rent | $2,713 | $1,513 |
| Homeownership | 64.7% | 64.7% |
| Average commute | 31.9 min | 23.3 min |
| Median age | 43 | 36.7 |
| Bachelor's degree + | 45.1% | 39.8% |
| Poverty rate | 7.2% | 10.8% |
| Unemployment | 5.3% | 5% |
| Price to income | 8.3× | 4.1× |
Highlighted where one city is clearly better on that measure. Population, density, home value and median age carry no highlight — a higher number there is good or bad depending on what you want.
Full profiles
- Union City, CAClimate, crime, housing
- Burnsville, MNClimate, crime, housing