Richland vs Burnsville
Richland, WA compared with Burnsville, MN · 1,258 miles apart
Richland has 65,258 residents to Burnsville’s 65,244. Richland comes out ahead on median household income, median rent, average commute. Burnsville does better on homeownership, unemployment, price to income.
| Richland, WA | Burnsville, MN | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 65,258 | 65,244 |
| Density (per sq mi) | 1,537 | 2,616 |
| Median household income | $95,813 | $87,024 |
| Median home value | $436,700 | $355,200 |
| Median rent | $1,468 | $1,513 |
| Homeownership | 64.4% | 64.7% |
| Average commute | 20.4 min | 23.3 min |
| Median age | 36.4 | 36.7 |
| Bachelor's degree + | 46.6% | 39.8% |
| Poverty rate | 9% | 10.8% |
| Unemployment | 5.6% | 5% |
| Price to income | 4.6× | 4.1× |
Highlighted where one city is clearly better on that measure. Population, density, home value and median age carry no highlight — a higher number there is good or bad depending on what you want.
Full profiles
- Richland, WAClimate, crime, housing
- Burnsville, MNClimate, crime, housing