New Braunfels vs Fairfield
New Braunfels, TX compared with Fairfield, CA · 1,487 miles apart
New Braunfels has 122,492 residents to Fairfield’s 122,489. New Braunfels comes out ahead on median rent, homeownership, average commute. Fairfield does better on median household income, clear days a year.
| New Braunfels, TX | Fairfield, CA | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 122,492 | 122,489 |
| Density (per sq mi) | 2,715 | 2,945 |
| Median household income | $86,021 | $101,895 |
| Median home value | $339,400 | $624,300 |
| Median rent | $1,654 | $2,266 |
| Homeownership | 65.3% | 61.3% |
| Average commute | 27.1 min | 30.7 min |
| Median age | 37.1 | 36.9 |
| Bachelor's degree + | 38.6% | 26.6% |
| Poverty rate | 7.4% | 10.2% |
| Unemployment | 4.2% | 5.8% |
| Price to income | 3.9× | 6.1× |
| Clear days a year | 53 | 69 |
| Days above 90°F | 110 | 45 |
Highlighted where one city is clearly better on that measure. Population, density, home value and median age carry no highlight — a higher number there is good or bad depending on what you want.
Full profiles
- New Braunfels, TXClimate, crime, housing
- Fairfield, CAClimate, crime, housing