New Braunfels vs Fairfield
New Braunfels, TX compared with Fairfield, CA · 1,487 miles apart
New Braunfels has 122,492 residents to Fairfield’s 122,489. New Braunfels comes out ahead on median rent, homeownership, average commute. Fairfield does better on median household income.
| New Braunfels, TX | Fairfield, CA | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 122,492 | 122,489 |
| Density (per sq mi) | 2,715 | 2,945 |
| Median household income | $86,021 | $101,895 |
| Median home value | $339,400 | $624,300 |
| Median rent | $1,654 | $2,266 |
| Homeownership | 65.3% | 61.3% |
| Average commute | 27.1 min | 30.7 min |
| Median age | 37.1 | 36.9 |
| Bachelor's degree + | 38.6% | 26.6% |
| Poverty rate | 7.4% | 10.2% |
| Unemployment | 4.2% | 5.8% |
| Price to income | 3.9× | 6.1× |
Highlighted where one city is clearly better on that measure. Population, density, home value and median age carry no highlight — a higher number there is good or bad depending on what you want.
Full profiles
- New Braunfels, TXClimate, crime, housing
- Fairfield, CAClimate, crime, housing