Los Angeles vs Napa
Los Angeles, CA compared with Napa, CA · 367 miles apart
Los Angeles has 3,869,089 residents to Napa’s 76,562. Los Angeles comes out ahead on median rent, bachelor's degree +. Napa does better on median household income, homeownership, average commute.
| Los Angeles, CA | Napa, CA | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,869,089 | 76,562 |
| Density (per sq mi) | 8,223 | 4,241 |
| Median household income | $81,939 | $105,963 |
| Median home value | $921,200 | $856,400 |
| Median rent | $1,933 | $2,282 |
| Homeownership | 36% | 58.7% |
| Average commute | 30.7 min | 23.9 min |
| Median age | 37.2 | 41.5 |
| Bachelor's degree + | 38.5% | 38.2% |
| Poverty rate | 16.5% | 8.5% |
| Unemployment | 8.2% | 5.7% |
| Price to income | 11.2× | 8.1× |
| Clear days a year | 61 | — |
| Days above 90°F | 3 | — |
Highlighted where one city is clearly better on that measure. Population, density, home value and median age carry no highlight — a higher number there is good or bad depending on what you want.
Full profiles
- Los Angeles, CAClimate, crime, housing
- Napa, CAClimate, crime, housing