Los Angeles vs Livermore
Los Angeles, CA compared with Livermore, CA · 315 miles apart
Los Angeles has 3,869,089 residents to Livermore’s 83,457. Los Angeles comes out ahead on median rent, clear days a year. Livermore does better on median household income, homeownership, average commute.
| Los Angeles, CA | Livermore, CA | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,869,089 | 83,457 |
| Density (per sq mi) | 8,223 | 3,141 |
| Median household income | $81,939 | $160,775 |
| Median home value | $921,200 | $1,105,600 |
| Median rent | $1,933 | $2,677 |
| Homeownership | 36% | 72% |
| Average commute | 30.7 min | 30.1 min |
| Median age | 37.2 | 40.7 |
| Bachelor's degree + | 38.5% | 52.3% |
| Poverty rate | 16.5% | 4.9% |
| Unemployment | 8.2% | 3.6% |
| Price to income | 11.2× | 6.9× |
| Clear days a year | 61 | 52 |
| Days above 90°F | 3 | 35 |
Highlighted where one city is clearly better on that measure. Population, density, home value and median age carry no highlight — a higher number there is good or bad depending on what you want.
Full profiles
- Los Angeles, CAClimate, crime, housing
- Livermore, CAClimate, crime, housing